REPORT DIGEST
DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS
COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION
For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2010
Release Date: June 28, 2011
Summary of Findings:
Total this audit: 4
Total last audit: 4
Repeated from last audit: 1
State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, AUDITOR GENERAL
To obtain a copy of the Report contact:
Office of the Auditor General, Iles Park Plaza, 740 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703
(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887
This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov
____________________________
SYNOPSIS
• The Department did not adequately update its property
records in a timely manner or maintain proper documentation for property
• The Department did not have adequate controls over
contract agreements.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER STATE PROPERTY
The Department of Military Affairs (Department) did not
adequately update its property records in a timely manner or maintain proper
documentation for property. We noted the
following:
• Thirteen of 25 (52%) equipment additions tested, totaling
$60,481, were not timely added to the Department’s Property Listing. These items were recorded between 1 and 311
days late.
• Eight of 25 (32%) equipment deletions tested, totaling
$3,899, were not timely deleted from the Property Listing. These items were deleted between 19 and 507
days late.
• Two of 25 (10%) equipment deletions tested had improper
deletion amounts and descriptions on the “Request for Deletion from Inventory”
forms.
• Five of 50 (10%) property items tested, totaling $3,930,
were included on the Property Listing, but could not be physically
located. Three of 50 (6%) property items
tested, totaling $4,233, were not located at the location specified on the
Property Listing. (Finding 1, pages
9-10) This finding was first reported in
2004.
We recommended the
Department comply with the Administrative Code, the State Records Act, the
State Property Control Act and the Statewide Accounting Management System
Manual by ensuring that all property under its jurisdiction is properly
recorded and maintained.
Department officials
agreed and stated they will continue to review procedures and processes to
ensure that all property under its jurisdiction is properly recorded and
maintained. (For the previous Department
response, see Digest footnote #1)
INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER CONTRACTS
The Department did
not have adequate controls over contract agreements. We noted the following:
• Two of 6 (33%) interagency agreements tested, totaling
$65,074, were not signed by the appropriate parties and agreed to in a timely
manner. They were signed 29 and 30 days
after the beginning of the contract term.
• Five of 19 (26%) armory rental contracts tested, totaling
$8,172, were not signed prior to the beginning of services. They were signed 5 to 143 days after the
beginning of the contract term.
• Two of 25 (8%) contractual agreements tested, totaling
$34,809, were not reduced to writing and signed by all parties prior to the
beginning of the contract terms. They
were signed 29 and 54 days after the beginning of the contract term. (Finding 2, pages 11-12)
We recommended the Department implement internal controls to
ensure that contracts are signed and contain all required paperwork prior to
the beginning of services.
Department officials agreed and stated they will review
current processes and internal controls to ensure that contracts are signed and
contain all required paperwork prior to the beginning of services. The requirement for contract execution prior
to use will be reiterated.
OTHER FINDINGS
The remaining findings pertain to: 1) non-compliance with
Military Code of Illinois, and 2) voucher processing weakness. We will follow up on these findings during
our next examination of the Department.
AUDITOR’S OPINION
We conducted a compliance examination of the Department as
required by the Illinois State Auditing Act.
We have not audited any financial statements of the Department for the
purpose of expressing an opinion because the Department does not, nor is it
required to, prepare financial statements.
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND
Auditor General
WGH:GR:cmb
AUDITORS ASSIGNED
This examination was performed by the staff of the Office of
the Auditor General.
DIGEST FOOTNOTES
#1 – PROPERTY CONTROL WEAKNESSES – Previous Department
Response
The Department agreed with this finding. The Department will review our current
processes for ways to improve them to ensure compliance with applicable rules.